|
Launching the wire service. |
© A.E.P. Wall
Ask a
Catholic bishop to describe the Trinity and you’re likely to be told that it is a
mystery.
But ask
about sex and you may be told all about it, beginning with the notion that it
is generally restricted to procreation, that remarriage after divorce is a
scandal, that homosexual acts are sinful, that God favors celibates even though
they refuse one of his most engaging gifts.
Well, not
all of them refuse.
Priests and
religious who break their vows get little help from the church, which is stuck
in the whispered sexual science of a couple of millennia ago.
More than
half a century ago I was working on the copy desk at the Worcester Telegram when the phone rang. John J. Wright, the
Catholic Bishop of Worcester and future Cardinal Prefect of the Vatican’s
Sacred Congregation for the Clergy, was calling from his Jaguar while he was
being driven home from nearby Boston. He had heard a radio news report
announcing The Pill. He asked me to read details of the news account to him,
telling me that this might be the most explosive news of the time.
He was
right about many things, and he was right about the consequences of marketing
the contraception pill. His Jaguar, by the way, was a gift.
Availability
of The Pill sent shock waves through the church, which was able to adapt to
such things as radio, electric lights, penicillin and the printing press, but
it could be stubborn about science.
After
Wright was promoted to the larger Diocese of Pittsburgh in the mid-1960s I met
his brand-new assistant, fresh from the seminary. Donald Wuerl was a brilliant
priest who accompanied Wright to Rome as his secretary, eventually became
Bishop of Pittsburgh and now is the Cardinal Archbishop of Washington. He’s a
likeable and persuasive conservative with the theological instincts of a pope.
After he
came to dinner at my home years ago, my daughter said she had never met a
priest who was more enthusiastic about priesthood.
He is
securely attached to the ancient church, and an admired communicator with the
skills of the late Cardinal Joseph Bernardin but a more traditional commitment.
Both men understood the politics of advancement in the hierarchy, while
accommodating their leadership to differing world views.
Bernardin
was general secretary of the conference of bishops in Washington, D.C., when he
hired me as director and the first editor in chief of the National Catholic
News Service, which was operating at a loss and losing clients. It provided
daily news packets via the U.S Mail. My job was to balance the budget, regain
lost clients and convert the operation from mail to wire. When that job was
finished the conference of bishops gave me a special award as “founder of the
NC wire service.”
After
Bernardin was appointed Archbishop of Cincinnati his Washington job went to his
assistant, a priest. Along with others on his staff I went to his home diocese
for his ordination as a bishop. He confirmed two of my children in Baltimore’s
Basilica of the Assumption, once the home of Cardinal James Gibbons and the
legendary Baltimore Catechism. He was a
frequent dinner guest in my suburban Washington home. It was numbing to
discover that his interest in my sons was not limited to ecclesial
responsibilities. He never touched, but his stares were on amber, hoping for a
green light.
The
confrontation happened to come just as John Cody, the Cardinal Archbishop of
Chicago, offered me a job as editor of The
New World, now called the Catholic
New World. I couldn’t stay in Washington with that bishop as my boss, and
when I shared my concern with the president of the conference I was encouraged
to leave it in his hands. This was 1976, when I still believed that God spoke
through senior prelates and that the answer to all their opinions was Yes, Sir.
I believed that the Catholic church was always right, even when it was wrong.
Not all
Catholics see the same thing when they look at their church. Many of the
millions who have departed for other religions or for no religion see the
church as a big organization with a good purpose, like Rotary International.
Many others see it as the foundation of all legitimacy, not just huge and not
just more permanent that any government anywhere, but the final arbiter.
Many
Catholics become so distressed by the lack of democracy and the treatment of
women that they just quit. Others see their Catholicism as God-given and
non-refundable, their membership in the body of Christ as more basic than
national citizenship or racial inheritance. They understand bishops to be
fathers and pastors to all of their priests, those whose sins are trifling and
those whose sins bring horror and shame. Redemption may not be the business of
a Rotary club, but it is the business of the Catholic church. A priest who goes
astray is for many Catholics just like a lawbreaker sibling, loved if not
admired.
Such was
the atmosphere I knew because of my work, which gave me many clerical friends.
It was the atmosphere I knew when I was a trustee of St. Mary’s Seminary and
University in Baltimore, chairman of the board of regents of Chaminade College
(now University) in Honolulu, president of the International Federation of
Catholic Press Agencies and editor of various Catholic periodicals. A close personal
relationship with Bernardin led to my writing the first book about him, The Spirit of Cardinal Bernardin.
Curiously, when Cardinal Cody was my boss in Chicago he drew me away from some
of my responsibilities as archdiocesan editor in order to be his ghost writer
for a planned autobiography.
I was not
happy about that. Cody was resisting a federal grand jury investigation at the
time. He believed that church confidentiality was absolute, never subject to
government probes. And he believed that as corporation sole he owned and
operated the archdiocese. He once pointed to a Catholic cemetery as we drove
by, saying, “I own all this.” When he offered to sign my son’s application to
attend Quigley Seminary North he reassured me that he owned the school. The
rector, admirably, did not see it that way and David was admitted via the usual
application process, eventually graduating Number One in his class.
Cody wanted
me to live within walking distance of his residence, but not in his
neighborhood of mansions—including, to his dismay, the Playboy Mansion. The No Trespassing sign in Cody’s front yard
was to discourage lost tourists from ringing his doorbell, mistaking one
mansion for another. When I found an ideal condo across from the Lincoln Park
Zoo, a mile or less from the cardinal’s residence but in a lesser economic
zone, Cody whipped out his checkbook. He wrote a check to cover the down
payment and sent me to a senior bank official to arrange a mortgage.
During
hundreds of hours of interviews, Cody told me about his beliefs and
commitments, even about his amazing idea to blackmail the pope. The holy father
was being pressured to replace Cody as Chicago’s archbishop, but he didn’t do
it. Cody also fought off a Vatican proposal to install a coadjutor archbishop.
About the
time I took on the Washington job, symptoms of the unpronounceable ailment
appeared. Neither my doctor nor I recognized olivopontocerebellar
atrophy/multiple systems atrophy, a rare disease in search of a cure. The next
best thing to a cure is the kind of care I’ve been given by my family, friends,
medical and church folks, along with providers of a power chair and a four-wheel
scooter that eats up the sidewalks at 4 or 5 miles per hour.
Virtually
all of the gay priests I knew showed no unusual interest in my boys. There were
some, including a prominent educator and a priest in my long-ago parish who
invited my youngest to go camping with him. I still feel, as I did then, that
the church should do more to screen candidates for priesthood and, when there
are failures, it should provide professional care, just as it does for other
kinds of addicts. Nobody wants to be an alcoholic or a pedophile. Nobody should
assume that a gay priest is either one.
A kind of
global warming within Catholic Christianity is getting headlines, but not much
corrective attention. The church spends hundreds of millions on lawyers and
settlements with victims, men, women and children. It spends little on the
study of human sexuality and it blinds itself to science. This is not new.
In 1977 a
study commissioned by the Catholic Theological Society of America was
introduced with, among others, these words: “The church’s tradition is marked
by an historical development extending some three thousand years… Inadequate
knowledge of biology, as well as religious taboos, the tradition of subhuman
treatment of women, and a dualistic philosophy of human nature have all left a
distinct imprint upon Catholic thinking.”
Back in
1968 I served on the Abortion Committee (that’s what he called it) appointed by
Cardinal Lawrence Shehan. It included prominent members of scientific and
theological communities. Its job was to help Shehan develop a position paper
for his service on a commission appointed by Pope Paul VI. It was to address,
head on, the vital question of contraception, or what the church called
artificial birth control.
In Rome
Shehan voted with the majority. Paul VI rejected the Majority Report when he
issued his encyclical Humanae Vitae, which was loudly rejected by countless
priests and quietly rejected by the laity in general. The consequences of
Paul’s rejection are widespread today, including an attitude that if one papal
ruling could be so conspicuously incorrect, maybe church authority in general
isn’t all that reliable.
The church
has frittered away its position of spiritual and strategic power in Europe and
may be doing the same in North America. When this happens, bishops aren’t the
only losers.
Catholics
for centuries have engaged in persecutions and suffered from them, have shaped
education for the better and not-better, have sustained nations in worship and
have lost nations, and many believe today’s turmoil is only a ripple in the
Catholic centuries.
The church
did not get its start with a cross of serenity. It has been looking for a few
good men longer than the Marine Corps has. Unlike the Marine Corps, it still
isn’t looking for a few good women.
No comments:
Post a Comment